December 18, 2025

Companies that Have Paid IEEPA Tariffs Should Consider Filing Protective Lawsuits Now

Category:

Companies that have paid IEEPA tariffs being challenged in the Supreme Court should consider filing protective lawsuits now in the Court of International Trade seeking refunds in the event the Supreme Court invalidates the tariffs.

It has been reported that the Administration is playing hardball, denying requests to extend the 314-day deadline to “liquidate” the tariffs. “The Trump administration is racing to deposit the money it’s raised from tariffs into the U.S. Treasury, a tactic that could make it harder for companies to get refunds for duties the Supreme Court may strike down in the coming months.” Politico, Dec. 14, 2025. One possibility is that the Administration may oppose refunds of even invalid tariffs because the retailer did not act within the 314-day window after the tariffs were paid.

We filed a brief in the Supreme Court for one retailer client arguing that the tariffs are illegal, and we also filed a protective lawsuit for another retailer client seeking refunds if the Court invalidates the tariffs.

If you would like to discuss this matter further or to take immediate action, please contact one of our tariff litigation lawyers.

Peter Brann pbrann@brannlaw.com

David Swetnam-Burland dsb@brannlaw.com

David Joyce djoyce@brannlaw.com

Related News

  • Maine Legislature Considering Problematic New Privacy Bill

    On February 10, 2026, Maine’s House of Representatives passed LD 1822, the Maine Online Data Privacy Act. This law surfaced in early 2025, then, as now, it faced stiff opposition from the business community. On behalf of the Maine State Chamber of Commerce, we lobbied last spring to abandon LD 1822 in favor of a…

  • Supreme Court Invalidates Emergency Tariffs: What It Means and What’s Next

    IEEPA tariffs declared invalid. As you’ve probably heard, the Supreme Court definitively invalidated all International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) tariffs in a 6–3 opinion today in Learning Resources v. Trump. Cutting through the legalese, the majority held IEEPA does not authorize the President to impose tariffs, full stop.  What’s next? The Court resolved a separate question about…